From Dr. Bourff: Academic Rigor
Academic
rigor is frequently described by educators as high expectations, engaging work,
deeper analysis, or critical thinking—all of which are elements of sound
preparation for a student’s future. However, longer exercises,
assignments over vacations, accelerated pacing, or more homework are often
mistaken for or passed off by educators as academic rigor.
Rigor derives from the Latin rigere,
which means to be stiff and inflexible. The term rigor mortis
derives from the same word. It is ironic that, if misused in an
educational context, rigor can result in what Diane Ravitch described as a
deadly dullness; in essence, a return to the meaning of its Latin root.
Rigor is the opposite of "deadly dullness." It's rigor, not rigor mortis. |
HSE21
is predicated on the most positive aspects of academic rigor. We must be
vigilant that our instructional strategies do not reflect the negative aspects
of the same term. Failure to recognize the difference can destroy not
only the spirit of HSE21 but also a student’s interest and passion
for learning.
From Stephanie: Rigor is Love
When
we have questions related to solving problems that offer us an alternative
advantage or support a personal interest, we enter the “Inquiry Zone.”
This
zone is the sweet spot for inquiry. Our thoughts run wild and free. It’s
energizing, and it’s frustrating. It is the love we feel for work that involves
us personally. It’s worthy and satisfying work because it’s related to our
personal interests and goals.
This
love of learning is at the heart of Rigor.
An
Example of Rigorous Work
I
brought this love to my own inquiry work by asking the question: Why am I still
in love with Diet Coke? Love is sometimes hard—especially when you love Diet
Coke and you know you have to stop.
I
brought energy and passion to my research and to the action steps that followed
it. A quick Google search yielded many
unexpected results for Diet Coke usage. It can be used:
Rigor is putting knowledge into action. |
- To remove a toilet bowl ring;
- As a treatment for lice;
- To remove oil stains from the garage floor;
- With tin foil to remove rust: and
- To remove gum from hair.
How could
I possibly be in love with something so potentially dangerous? Myth or
not, I knew I had to get a handle on my problem, so I made a plan to stop
drinking Diet Coke.
When
I broke up with Diet Coke I…
- Spent time close reading;
- Grew giddy in planning my future healthy self on Pinterest;
- Compared the reasoning of multiple perspectives;
- Analyzed the effectiveness of some of the cleaning tips;
- Tried a disgusting morning detox shot; and
- Sorted out the myths and learned more about Aspartame.
There
is no question that I brought energy and passion to my research and to the
steps that helped me break up with my love!
Rigor resides in inquiry, and it includes: identifying issues, resolving
conflicts, and solving dilemmas. I had
to sort, respond, and shift my thinking.
This is rigorous work, so rigorous that it became distracting to other
thoughts.
There’s
a palpable love here—and I’m not talking about Diet Coke. It is love born of
hard work. It’s the love of deep thinking. And it is the love of putting knowledge into
action.
Rigor
is love!
Good-bye
old love. I do appreciate the rust removal tip. You came in very handy on my
screen door! But I’ll stick with my new love.
From Jan: Rigor and Homework
Parents
around the district at all levels have expressed concern about the amount of
homework and the quality of homework that is sometimes required of their
students. They have concerns that what is being asked of students feels
like busy work.
We
would do well to pause and consider carefully what we are assigning our students and how much we are asking of our students (and often their families).
- Does the work involve a rigorous process? (Not just more work or faster work)
- Is it worthy work?
- Is it authentic work, deeper work, or engaging work?
If the
answers are yes, homework can be valuable and rigorous. If not, we should rethink what we are asking students
to do outside of our classrooms.
From Phil: Relevance and Student Talk
Next fall,
Kylene Beers and Bob Probst are joining us on the first teacher work day. They are two of my educational heroes. Several chapters in their most recent book, Reading Nonfiction, fit nicely with
today’s topic. The first is called
“Rigor and Relevance,” and the second is “Classroom Conversations.”
My favorite books end up with lots of highlights and sticky notes. |
Since
the focus of their book is on reading, Beers and Probst write about text, but you can add or task to their words below, and their
wisdom about rigor will make just as much sense. From Beers and Probst:
Rigor resides in
the transaction between the reader and the text [or task]. It is achieved not simply by selecting a
challenging text [or task], but rather by deepening the reader’s engagement
with the text [or task].
Beers
and Probst say the key to rigor is
deepening the student’s engagement,
and the key to deepening engagement is whether or not the text—or task—has
relevance to the student. The route to
relevance for students involves powerful classroom conversations. Students
must do the talking, the questioning, the thinking.
Beers
and Probst make a distinction between talk to check understanding (which is primarily monologic/teacher talk) and
talk to create understanding (which
is primarily dialogic/student talk).
I
used my highlighter notes from the two chapters to create the chart below about
the connections between Rigor and Engagement/Relevance/Student Talk in the classroom.
Rigor:
What it Is
|
Rigor:
What it is NOT
|
Students
asking questions of the teacher and of each other
|
Teachers
asking most or all of the questions
|
Students
making connections to other learning
|
Teachers
telling students about the connections to other learning
|
Students
reading, discussing, and analyzing text
|
Teachers
summarizing reading for students
|
Students
bringing energy and effort to the text or task: A questioning stance
|
Students
accepting text at face value: little or no questioning of the content or
purpose of the text or task
|
Students
wanting to take on difficult texts or tasks, wanting to learn more about a
topic, and wanting to explore beyond the expectations of the teacher
|
Teachers
assigning difficult texts or tasks, pushing advanced curriculum to lower levels,
and/or accelerating coverage of material
|
Students
working on relevant texts and
tasks—not just interesting texts and tasks
|
Students
working on texts and tasks that may or may not be interesting, but are not relevant
|
Student
talk to create understanding: Dialogic talk between students is a regular
and predominate part of instruction
|
Student
talk limited to checking
understanding: Primarily Monologic
talk from teacher and students
|
Students
involved in work that challenges their thinking in new and interesting ways
|
Students
involved in work based in a single-perspective or approach
|
I
would love to hear from you. Send me
your ideas for what Rigor Is and What Rigor is NOT.
Have
a great week, HSE. We hope your days are filled with rigor and with love.
Your HSE Teaching and Learning
Team
- Jan Combs, Assistant Superintendent of Teaching and Learning
- Stephanie Loane, Director of Elementary Education
- Tom Bell, Director of Special Education
- Jeff Harrison, Director of Educational Technology
- Phil Lederach, Director of Secondary Education